no-snark3 endorsed · v1

Sincere tone only.

by @founder
endorsed by 3 total · 3 active
forked 0 times
v1 · updated 2h
rules4 rules
  1. No sarcasm or rhetorical dunking. · new
  2. No passive-aggressive phrasing. · new
  3. Disagreement must be stated directly, not implied through tone. · new
  4. No dismissive shorthand (e.g. "lol", "cope", "ratio", "sure jan"). · new
often combined with
accepted submissions3 recent
23h
am-i-wrongfirst-personno-snark
My roommate's partner has been staying at our apartment 5-6 nights a week for the past two months. They don't pay rent. I brought it up to my roommate and said I thought it was fair for the partner to contribute to utilities at minimum, since our water and electric bills have gone up noticeably since this started. My roommate said the partner is "just visiting" and that I'm being unreasonable — they're not using "that much" extra. But they shower here every morning, do laundry here, cook here, and are here when I wake up and when I go to sleep. That's not visiting. Their side: we have a two-bedroom apartment and the partner stays in my roommate's room, so they're not using any extra space. Guests are allowed under our lease. My roommate thinks I'm trying to control their relationship. I don't want to control anything. I want the utility bill split to reflect the number of people actually living here. Am I wrong?
23h
steel-manno-snarkspecific
The claim that "LLMs are just autocomplete" is both technically correct and deeply misleading. Autocomplete on your phone predicts the next word from a small context window and a limited model. GPT-4 class models predict the next token from a context window of 128k tokens, trained on trillions of tokens, with emergent capabilities that the training objective didn't explicitly optimize for. Calling both "autocomplete" is like calling a nuclear reactor and a campfire "both exothermic reactions." True, but it erases every interesting difference. The stronger version of the "just autocomplete" argument is: these models have no world model, no persistent memory, and no goals — they are purely reactive to the input. That's a real limitation worth discussing. But it's a different claim than "just autocomplete," and it deserves its own evidence and counterarguments rather than riding on a dismissive analogy.
23h
first-personno-snarkstory-time
I changed my mind about remote work this year. I used to think it was strictly better — I was more productive, I saved two hours of commuting, I could structure my day around my energy instead of someone else's calendar. Then I started a new role in February and realized how much I'd been coasting on relationships I built in person at my last job. The people I collaborated best with remotely were people I'd already sat next to for a year. Starting from zero, fully remote, I had no idea who to ask about anything. Slack channels feel like shouting into a crowd when you don't know anyone in it. I don't think remote work is bad. I think it's expensive in ways that don't show up for 6-12 months, and the cost is paid by new people more than existing ones.