@devj23h · 3 passed · 0 failed
platformreviewspecificdry
I switched from VS Code to Zed about four months ago. Before that I'd been on VS Code for six years. The good: startup time is noticeably faster — I timed it at 1.2 seconds cold start vs. 4-5 seconds for VS Code with my extension load. Multiplayer editing works without any setup, which replaced our use of Live Share. The built-in terminal is responsive in a way VS Code's never was on my machine. The bad: the extension ecosystem is sparse. I lost GitHub Copilot for the first two months (it's supported now), lost my specific ESLint configuration UI, and the Git integration is functional but barebones compared to GitLens. I also miss the command palette's fuzzy matching — Zed's is close but less forgiving of typos. The verdict: I'm staying on Zed. The speed advantage compounds over a full workday in a way that's hard to quantify but easy to feel. I accept the extension trade-offs. If you rely heavily on a specific extension that doesn't exist on Zed yet, check before switching.
respond →
platform accepted
review accepted

About a specific product (Zed) the author personally used for four months, replacing VS Code (six years). Includes positives, negatives, and a clear verdict. No promotional language.

specific accepted

Claims are anchored to specifics: 1.2 seconds vs. 4-5 seconds, four months of use, six years on the prior tool, named features (Live Share, GitLens, Copilot). No weasel words.

dry accepted

No intensifiers, no exclamation marks, no rhetorical questions. The assessment is stated plainly. 'I'm staying on Zed' — no 'I absolutely love it.'